| written by Leniad on Feb 03, 2009 22:55 |
 | |  | | ![]() Except that the seers don't know what kind of seer they are.
The fact that you don't know that makes you quite suspicious, actually. | |  | |  |
|
| written by Buuks on Feb 03, 2009 22:57 |
 | |  | | ![]() Is it possible to investigate yourself in our game?
Reading the description on the wiki, it is up to the Mod. | |  | |  |
|
| written by 23 on Feb 04, 2009 01:40 |
| | | | Well, My idea was we just vote our first search and find out. We should have all investigated the same person, I just picked the first name on the list. | | | | |
|
| written by Buuks on Feb 04, 2009 16:13 |
| | | | ![]() Why the first name, because you are at the end of the list? Kinda suspicious to me.
When we pick one person to investigate, we should pick him randomly. | | | | |
|
| written by 23 on Feb 04, 2009 21:41 |
| | | | Suspicious shush-micious.
It was Night-0 and there was no discussion, so I picked the candidate that others might pick based on the probability others might use, ie position at top of list.
This seems logical to me, and the fact that you ignore any reasoned appraisal of my actions in order to draw attention towards myself makes yourself seem unreasonable. | | | | |
|
| written by Trad.a on Feb 04, 2009 22:01 |
 | |  | | ![]()  | Leniad said: | Except that the seers don't know what kind of seer they are.
The fact that you don't know that makes you quite suspicious, actually. |
Obviously. I will clarify. <if> we mass claim, sooner or later the scumsters are going have to counter claim. Then its only a matter of lynching the most suspicious. No pro-town would lie about their role (even if they are one of the more useless roles such as naive seer).
| Buuks said: | Why the first name, because you are at the end of the list? Kinda suspicious to me.
When we pick one person to investigate, we should pick him randomly. |
Hm, we might as well do it randomly. I rolled a die (well, random.olrg) and the result was a 2. L4?
I think this way will give us information. If we all target L4 we should come back with:
1 Guilty (Paranoid)
1 Innocent (Naive
1 Guilty (sane or insane)
1 Innocent (sane or insane)
Conundrum. We will not benefit at all. Maybe if everybody targets themselves?
Thoughts. | |  | |  |
|
| written by 23 on Feb 04, 2009 23:16 |
| | | | We will benefit if we then lynch the investigated person. This will tell us all what type of seer we are.
In this type of game we have to lynch once in order to get as much info as possible | | | | |
|
| written by Buuks on Feb 05, 2009 00:34 |
 | |  | | ![]() | 23 said: | We will benefit if we then lynch the investigated person. This will tell us all what type of seer we are.
In this type of game we have to lynch once in order to get as much info as possible |
hmm, nice thought. But is it possible to do that in the same night? Because that will speed things up.
Or will the investigation going wrong because we lynched him. I mean we don't know the order in which things will happen. | |  | |  |
|
| written by Trad.a on Feb 05, 2009 03:01 |
| | | | ![]() We no lynch today, target Draken tonight and lynch him tomorrow. | | | | |
|
| written by Leniad on Feb 05, 2009 04:25 |
| | | | ![]() The plan isn't bad, but we must make sure the person we choose as a target is chosen randomly. For example, what if you, Trad.a, are a werewolf? Then you'd be pointing us to a townie to lynch.
Is there a method that lets us all make sure the person has been chosen randomly? Nothing comes to mind right now, but it might be because it's way past my bed time  | | | | |
|
| written by 23 on Feb 05, 2009 04:58 |
| | | | How about we lynch the first person that proposed a certain person to lynch, which means Trad.a!
Unvote raken
Vote: Trad.a | | | | |
|
| written by Trad.a on Feb 05, 2009 05:40 |
| | | | ![]() | Leniad said: | The plan isn't bad, but we must make sure the person we choose as a target is chosen randomly. For example, what if you, Trad.a, are a werewolf? Then you'd be pointing us to a townie to lynch.
Is there a method that lets us all make sure the person has been chosen randomly? Nothing comes to mind right now, but it might be because it's way past my bed time |
| Trad.a said: | | Leniad said: | Except that the seers don't know what kind of seer they are.
The fact that you don't know that makes you quite suspicious, actually. |
Obviously. I will clarify. <if> we mass claim, sooner or later the scumsters are going have to counter claim. Then its only a matter of lynching the most suspicious. No pro-town would lie about their role (even if they are one of the more useless roles such as naive seer).
| Buuks said: | Why the first name, because you are at the end of the list? Kinda suspicious to me.
When we pick one person to investigate, we should pick him randomly. |
Hm, we might as well do it randomly. I rolled a die (well, random.org) and the result was a 2. |
I've already proposed a way to truely randomly picked somebody. www.random.org does the trick.
So, to modify the plan..
we pick a random person (using random.org)
we all target them tonight
we lynch them tomorrow and share our findings.
What do you guys think?
@23, you were the one that proposed we lynch Draken in this post.
| 23 said: | | Well, My idea was we just vote our first search and find out. We should have all investigated the same person, I just picked the first name on the list. |
And now you are voting me because you think I am. That is terrible, terrible logic. Very suspicious, indeed. | | | | |
|
  | written by Draken on Feb 05, 2009 06:41 |
| | | | ![]() | Trad.a said: | | We no lynch today, target Draken tonight and lynch him tomorrow. |
I hope this was just a random example...
But otherwise, with the amending of the plan, sounds fine.
Though the unlucky victim may not appreciate it... | | | | |
|
| written by Leniad on Feb 05, 2009 15:52 |
| | | | ![]() | Trad.a said: | I've already proposed a way to truely randomly picked somebody. www.random.org does the trick.
So, to modify the plan..
we pick a random person (using random.org)
we all target them tonight
we lynch them tomorrow and share our findings.
What do you guys think? |
The problem is, that is random if you actually used the random.org site.
But maybe, just maybe, you are scum, and have chosen non scum, while telling us it's random to make us feel better.
I want a way that assures all of us that the pick is really random. | | | | |
|
| written by Megagun on Feb 05, 2009 23:42 |
| | | | ![]() Night 1
As suddenly as the Werewolves arrived in the friendly, nameless town, the sun went below the horizon, and all townies went home, scared by the
prospect of being mauled by the werewolves during the night, glad that no-one got lynched.
Werewolves: choose a victim.
Seers: pick someone to investigate| Player | Status | | Draken | alive | | Lightning4 | alive | | Leniad | alive | | Trad.a | alive | | 23 | alive | | Buuks | alive | | Ferinex | alive
|
 - 7 alive.
Day 2 starts on 23:40 of the 6th (or perhaps an hour earlier, if everyone picked a target by then, since I made a mistake with Day 1's length). | | | | |
|
| 
